Introduction
Controller Area Network (CAN) bus systems are used in many applications where reliable, multi-node communication is needed. As networks grow in size or complexity, designers often face physical limitations on bus length, node count, or topology. A CAN bus repeater is a device used to address some of these limitations by linking two or more CAN bus segments together. It effectively regenerates and forwards CAN signals between segments, which can help cover longer distances or include more devices on the network. Unlike higher-level CAN gateways, repeaters operate at the physical and data link layer, making the joined segments behave as one logical bus. This report explains what CAN repeaters are, how they function electrically and logically, how they handle signal integrity and timing, and the advantages and challenges of using them in a CAN network.
What is a CAN Bus Repeater and How Does It Work?
A CAN bus repeater is an active network component that connects two (or more) sections of a CAN network, passing all CAN traffic between them in real time. Internally, a repeater typically contains two CAN transceivers linked back-to-back with some arbitration logic between them. In essence, it listens to signals on one segment and drives them out onto the other segment, and vice versa. An ideal repeater behaves like a transparent extension of the bus – essentially as if it were just an extra length of cable. Because it operates at the bit level, the repeater does not interpret or alter CAN messages; it simply reproduces the electrical CAN signals from one side to the other. This means all nodes on all connected segments still see the same data bits almost simultaneously, preserving the normal operation of CAN (including its error detection and arbitration mechanisms). A repeater may also include features like galvanic isolation between segments (to break ground loops or protect against voltage differences), but logically it does not act as a filter or router – it’s a physical layer device that makes multiple segments act as one unified network.
Electrical and Logical Role in Network Extension
Physical Segmentation: When a repeater divides a CAN network into two segments, each segment is electrically separate and must be properly terminated with 120 Ω resistors at its ends, just like an independent bus. The repeater’s transceivers interface with each segment, so from an electrical standpoint each bus segment only “sees” the transceiver of the repeater rather than every node on the far side. This reduces the capacitive load and can allow a greater total number of nodes in the system (since each segment can host the maximum nodes that a single bus could support). In practice, using a repeater can increase the allowable node count because it splits the network into separate electrical domains for each segment while still linking them logically.
Logical Unity: Despite the physical segmentation, the network remains a single logical CAN bus. All frames transmitted in one segment are forwarded to the other, so every node across all segments receives the same messages and participates in the same arbitration domain. The segments connected by a repeater are physically independent, but form a single CAN network from the logical point of view. No addressing or routing is needed; nodes are not aware that a repeater is present. This allows a repeater to facilitate more complex topologies. For example, repeaters enable non-linear topologies such as star or tree structures by splitting the bus into multiple branches. In a simple line topology, adding long stub cables or star connections would normally introduce signal reflections and stability problems; a repeater overcomes this by electrically isolating each branch. Thus, one major role of a repeater is allowing flexible wiring layouts (e.g. multiple sub-networks branching out) while keeping all nodes in one unified CAN network. This can shorten the longest communication paths in a system and simplify cabling, since devices can be clustered on different short bus segments rather than one very long daisy-chain.
Signal Integrity, Propagation Delay, and Arbitration
Signal Integrity: By actively regenerating the CAN signals, repeaters help maintain signal integrity over longer distances or in complex layouts. As signals travel down a long cable, they can become attenuated or distorted; a repeater effectively “cleans up” the signal by receiving and then retransmitting it with proper voltage levels and edge timing. In other words, it refreshes the CAN signal for extended runs, helping to overcome loss and ensuring that each segment sees a strong, sharp waveform. This is especially useful when a network must span a distance or environment where a single continuous bus would suffer quality issues. Each segment between repeaters behaves like a fresh CAN bus electrically, which can improve reliability and reduce issues like ringing or reflections on long stub lines.
Propagation Delay: A critical consideration with repeaters is the delay they introduce. The repeater’s transceivers and logic take a small but finite time to sense a bit on one side and drive it on the other. This propagation delay is typically on the order of tens or hundreds of nanoseconds. While small, this delay adds to the signal travel time between the furthest nodes on the network. In fact, it is common to express a repeater’s delay as an “equivalent cable length” – for example, one source notes that a standard repeater’s latency might equate to roughly 40 m of extra cable in a CAN network without isolation (and about 60 m if the repeater is galvanically isolated). Another reference calculation shows that a ~120 ns end-to-end repeater delay is roughly analogous to adding 24 m of bus length (assuming ~5 ns/m signal propagation in cable). This additional delay means repeaters do not magically allow the network to violate CAN’s timing limits. The maximum overall bus length for a given bit rate is still bounded by the CAN protocol’s propagation requirements – the repeater just consumes part of that budget in its internal processing. In practice, if you use a repeater to extend distance, you may need to reduce the bit rate or otherwise ensure that the sum of cable lengths plus repeater delays stays within the allowable range for proper synchronization. Most CAN repeaters are designed to keep delay very low, but when chaining multiple repeaters or running at high bit speeds (e.g. 1 Mbps or CAN FD fast rates), the cumulative latency can become significant.
Arbitration Across Extended Buses: CAN’s media access control (MAC) relies on bitwise arbitration – when two nodes transmit simultaneously, the node sending a dominant bit (logical 0) will override a recessive bit (logical 1) on the bus, allowing the system to resolve which message has higher priority. For arbitration to work correctly across a repeater, every node must witness the dominant/recessive state of the bus with minimal delay differences. A CAN repeater’s internal logic ensures that whenever one segment drives a dominant bit, it is immediately driven onto the other segment, effectively coupling the segments into one common bus state. The repeater “regenerates” the direction of transmission on the fly based on bus timing—if a node on segment A starts transmitting, the repeater forwards those bits to segment B, and if a node on B transmits, the bits are forwarded to A, all at the same time. In the event that nodes on both sides transmit simultaneously, the repeater’s arbitration logic lets the normal CAN arbitration occur as if it were a single bus: a dominant bit from either side will propagate through the repeater and be seen by all nodes, causing the appropriate transmitter to back off. In this way, the repeater preserves the single-collision domain and non-destructive arbitration of CAN. However, the propagation delay discussed above is crucial here: if the repeater’s delay is too large relative to the bit time, a dominant bit from a distant node might not reach another node before that node samples the bit, potentially violating arbitration timing. This is why network design with repeaters must account for latency so that all nodes remain synchronized within each bit time. When properly used within timing constraints, a repeater maintains data consistency and real-time arbitration across the extended bus segments. All nodes continue to behave as if directly connected, aside from a slight increase in propagation time.
Advantages of Using CAN Bus Repeaters
-
Extended Network Reach: One advantage of repeaters is enabling a CAN network to span a larger physical distance or area. By placing a repeater in between long cable runs, the signal can be refreshed and driven further without degrading beyond recognition. While a repeater does not allow you to exceed the fundamental propagation limits for a given bit rate, it does allow a long route to be split into shorter segments, each within proper limits. For example, a very long bus cable can be segmented with a repeater such that each segment remains reliable, effectively covering the needed distance in steps. The repeater’s active signal regeneration counteracts attenuation on long cables, ensuring that each segment of the bus sees clean, valid signals. In summary, repeaters can extend the usable range of CAN communications (especially at lower bit rates or when used with appropriate timing settings) by re-driving the signal partway.
-
Topology Flexibility: Repeaters make it possible to implement star, tree, or other complex topologies that are not feasible with a single linear bus. In a standard CAN bus, all nodes are typically daisy-chained on one line (or with very short stubs) to avoid reflections. By contrast, using repeaters as branching points, you can create a hub-and-spoke layout or multiple bus segments branching off, all still functioning as one network. This flexibility can significantly simplify wiring in systems where a pure line topology would be inefficient or impractical. It can also reduce the longest path between any two nodes, which helps in meeting timing requirements. For instance, instead of one bus running end-to-end through every node, one could use a central repeater (or a series of repeaters) to split the network into shorter sub-buses that connect at a central point. By doing so, the overall cable length between farthest nodes is reduced, potentially allowing a higher baud rate or more reliable communication. In short, repeaters enable creative network layouts to optimize installation without sacrificing the unified nature of the CAN bus.
-
Increased Node Capacity: Because a repeater divides the network into separate electrical segments, each segment can support the maximum number of nodes allowed by the physical layer (transceiver) limitations. In a single CAN bus, the number of nodes is limited by electrical factors (bus loading, rise times, etc.). By splitting into two segments, the bus driver load is halved on each side, which means more devices in total can be connected to the overall system. For example, if a given transceiver technology supports up to N nodes on one bus, a repeater could allow up to N nodes on each side (minus the repeater itself) without overload, effectively doubling the available node count. This is useful in large installations where dozens of CAN devices need to communicate. The repeater ensures that all nodes (potentially across multiple segments) still see all traffic, so the application behaves as one large network.
-
Electrical Isolation and Reliability: Many CAN repeaters provide galvanic isolation between the connected segments. An isolated repeater breaks any direct electrical connection, which helps in two ways: it isolates ground potential differences and it contains electrical noise or faults to one segment. Isolation improves safety and noise immunity – for instance, if there is a high voltage surge or a ground fault on one segment, an isolated repeater can prevent that from directly affecting devices on the other segment. Additionally, some repeaters implement fault-handling features such as automatically disconnecting a segment that is stuck in a fault dominant state. In practice, this means if a section of the network experiences a serious failure (e.g. a short circuit that forces the bus to a constant dominant 0), the repeater can detect this and cut off that segment, allowing the rest of the network to continue operating. This capability effectively isolates certain failures, improving overall system robustness. Even when not dealing with catastrophic faults, the isolation provided by repeaters can localize the impact of EMI (electromagnetic interference) or local errors. Each segment handles its own noise to some extent, and the repeater only transmits clean CAN states across. In summary, using repeaters can partition the network into smaller fault domains to a degree – while still sharing data, a problem on one branch might be prevented from propagating uncontrolled to others (except for standard error signaling, as discussed later). This isolation benefit ties in with improved electromagnetic compatibility and the ability to interface different electrical environments (for example, connecting a high-noise subsystem via an optical or isolated repeater so it doesn’t disturb the rest of the bus).
-
Problem Solving and Incremental Expansion: A practical advantage of CAN repeaters is solving network layout problems without redesigning the entire system or switching to a more complex networking method. If an existing CAN bus is at its limits (in length, nodes, or topology), adding a repeater can often alleviate the issue with minimal changes. It provides an option to extend or reshape the network “organically.” This can be much more cost-effective than moving to a higher-cost solution like a CAN-to-CAN gateway or adding a completely different communication network. For instance, in an industrial setting, if a few extra devices need to be added beyond the node limit or a new branch of cable is needed to reach equipment off the main line, a repeater can be installed to accommodate this. In short, repeaters offer a low-cost and straightforward way to expand CAN systems while keeping the same protocol and overall simplicity of a single bus.
Disadvantages and Challenges of Repeaters
While CAN bus repeaters can be very useful, they also come with certain drawbacks and limitations that engineers must consider:
-
Propagation Delay and Timing Impact: Perhaps the most significant concern is the propagation delay introduced by the repeater. As discussed, this delay effectively lengthens the bus in timing terms. If the network is not reconfigured to account for it (for example, by lowering the bit rate or adjusting sample point settings), the added latency can cause errors. In worst cases, using too many repeaters or an inappropriate repeater at a high speed can lead to arbitration failures or nodes not seeing acknowledgments in time. Therefore, one should treat each repeater as equivalent to several extra meters of cable and ensure the total network propagation meets the CAN specification for the chosen bit rate. This may limit how many repeaters can be used in series or how fast the bus can run when a repeater is present. Essentially, repeaters do not allow you to break the CAN timing rules, and they can even tighten the margins if not used sparingly. Network design must include the repeater’s delay in the bit timing calculations.
-
Transparency and Fault Propagation: Another drawback is that a repeater does not inherently contain errors or isolate traffic the way a gateway would. Because it is bit-transparent, any error frame or disturbance on one segment is immediately forwarded to the other. For example, if a node on segment A detects an error and transmits an error flag (which is a special dominant error frame in CAN), the repeater will send that error frame into segment B as well. All nodes in the entire extended network will react to the error. Similarly, electrical noise causing sporadic bit errors or an intermittent fault on one side will still affect the whole system since the repeater blindly repeats the analog bus state. In terms of fault containment, a repeater does not create an independent island – the entire network remains one fault domain for most issues. The only exception, as noted earlier, is that some smart repeaters can automatically cut off a permanently faulty segment (like one stuck dominant). But for normal error conditions and recoverable faults, the repeater provides no filtering: it propagates all traffic, good or bad. This means using a repeater can sometimes make troubleshooting harder – a problem anywhere propagates everywhere – and it does not reduce the impact of errors on bus load or stability (whereas a gateway could quarantine an error-heavy node by not forwarding its frames). In summary, repeaters lack fine-grained fault isolation, which is a trade-off for their simplicity.
-
No Message Filtering or ID Translation: Since repeaters operate at the physical layer and do not interpret CAN frames, they cannot provide any selective control over the traffic. All CAN messages, regardless of identifier or content, are broadcast to all segments. There is no way to block certain messages or alter them between segments – for that functionality a more complex device like a CAN router or gateway would be needed. Additionally, a repeater cannot connect CAN buses running at different bit rates. Both sides of a repeater must share the same baud rate and protocol settings, because the repeater is effectively just merging them into one timing domain. This is a limitation if you wanted, for instance, to join a 500 kbps bus to a 250 kbps bus – a repeater cannot do that, whereas a CAN/CAN gateway could (by buffering and retransmitting frames). Thus, repeaters sacrifice flexibility: they are purely a physical extender and cannot perform any higher-level traffic management. In some cases, this is a disadvantage if you need to enforce segmentation of traffic or accommodate different CAN configurations in parts of the system.
-
Added Complexity and Points of Failure: Introducing a repeater adds another active component into the network. This means additional installation complexity (power supply for the repeater, mounting, and connectors) and another device that could potentially fail. In a previously simple bus that was just wires and terminators, a repeater is an active element that must operate correctly for communication to succeed. If the repeater loses power or malfunctions, it can bring down the communication between segments. Additionally, some repeaters have configurable settings (for example, an “inhibit time” or switch settings to optimize performance) which must be set correctly for the specific network timing. This requires the system integrator to have more detailed knowledge and perform validation tests. In short, a repeater introduces a maintenance overhead and a dependency that must be managed. From a reliability standpoint, it can become a single point of failure for the entire network if not backed up or redundant. Designers must weigh this added complexity against the benefits gained; in very simple or safety-critical systems, avoiding extra components might be preferred unless absolutely necessary.
-
No Extension of Bus Speed-Length Product: It’s worth emphasizing that a repeater does not overcome the fundamental CAN limitation relating bus length and speed. For a given bit rate, CAN specifies a maximum network length to ensure that signals propagate and reach all nodes in time for synchronization and arbitration. A repeater cannot magically allow a faster bit rate on a long network – it simply segments the network so each piece can abide by the rules. The overall propagation delay from one end of the multi-segment bus to the other end is still subject to the same constraints as a single segment bus. In fact, due to the repeater’s own delay, the maximum distance between the farthest nodes might even need to be slightly less than it would in a single-segment bus at the same speed. Practically, this means if you need to significantly exceed standard length limits at high speeds, you might have to reduce the speed or use a true CAN-to-CAN bridge device that buffers frames (at the cost of added latency per frame). Repeaters are best viewed as a way to shape and maintain the network within normal limits, not as a means to violate the physics of CAN timing.
Conclusion
CAN bus repeaters serve as valuable tools for expanding and structuring CAN networks beyond the constraints of a simple bus line. They function by transparently relaying CAN signals between multiple bus segments, effectively creating a larger logical network without changing the CAN protocol or frame format. Electrically, they strengthen signals and isolate segments, allowing more versatile topologies and potentially more nodes. Their advantages include extended range, improved layout flexibility (supporting star and branch configurations), increased node capacity per system, and optional galvanic isolation that can enhance reliability. However, these benefits come with trade-offs. Repeaters introduce propagation delays that consume part of the timing budget, requiring careful consideration in high-speed designs. They do not isolate errors or traffic — any fault on one segment can still affect the whole network. Furthermore, they cannot perform any intelligent routing or accommodate differing baud rates, since they operate as a simple pass-through. Using a repeater adds an active device to the network, which increases system complexity and can be a point of failure if not managed properly.
In summary, a CAN repeater is best used when the goal is to extend or reconfigure the physical CAN bus while keeping a single unified CAN domain. It shines in scenarios where you need a longer or more distributed network but still want every node to communicate as peers on one bus. The repeater will maintain signal integrity and network transparency in these cases. Engineers should deploy repeaters with an understanding of their limitations: ensure the added delay does not break CAN timing, use isolated versions if ground differences are a concern, and do not expect the repeater to mitigate errors or segment traffic. When applied appropriately, CAN bus repeaters can significantly enhance the scalability and flexibility of CAN systems, bridging gaps that would otherwise require costly redesigns or more complex networking solutions. They allow the robust CAN protocol to be used in larger and more complex installations while preserving the simple, broadcast-based communication model that makes CAN so effective in real-time control networks.
CAN-11 CAN Bus DIN Rail Isolated Repeater
The CAN-11 CAN Bus DIN Rail Isolated Repeater is a robust, industrial-grade device designed to enhance the reliability and scalability of Controller Area Network (CAN) systems. It offers 1.5 kV electrical isolation using magnetic coupling technology, effectively protecting network components from electrical surges and ground loop interference. With support for CAN 2.0A/B standards and optional compatibility with the CAN-FD protocol, the repeater ensures seamless integration into various applications, including automotive electronics, industrial automation, and intelligent instrumentation. Its plug-and-play design, coupled with a slim modular form factor and detachable terminals, facilitates easy installation on standard 35mm DIN rails, making it suitable for diverse network topologies such as linear, star, and tree structures.
The CAN-11 features adaptive baud rate support ranging from 10 Kbps to 1 Mbps (up to 5 Mbps for CAN-FD), enabling it to accommodate a wide range of network speeds. Its built-in bus arbitration logic and dominant timeout (DTO) function enhance network stability by isolating faulty segments, ensuring uninterrupted communication among healthy nodes. The device’s loopback time is as low as 110 nanoseconds, and it can support up to 110 nodes on the bus. Operating within a voltage range of 9 to 28 VDC and a temperature range of -25°C to +70°C, the CAN-11 is engineered for durability in demanding environments. Additionally, LED indicators provide real-time status updates for power and data traffic, aiding in efficient network monitoring and diagnostics. More information…
Comments are closed.